By Tiffany Williams –
In a swirl of speculation, New York Governor Kathy Hochul’s meetings on Tuesday with select individuals have ignited discussions throughout New York City.
Whispers among political insiders suggest that these discussions might involve a pivotal decision regarding New York City Mayor Eric Adams, with some suggesting the possibility of Hochul contemplating his removal from office as she gathers insights and perspectives from influential figures. Yet, the true motives behind these clandestine meetings remain known only to those in the room and Hochul’s inner circle.
Among those who met with Hochul was the prominent civil rights activist Al Sharpton, a figure known for his enduring advocacy and influence in societal matters.
As the scenario unfolds, Mayor Eric Adams finds himself standing firm, having narrowly escaped prosecution on serious federal corruption charges. With a defiant spirit, he has publicly declared that rather than stepping down, he is committed to stepping up, insisting he will continue to fulfill his responsibilities as the city’s leader.
The Department of Justice’s decision to refrain from moving forward with charges against Adams has not only drawn sharp criticisms but has also led to the resignation of six esteemed prosecutors, raising questions about the integrity of the legal process.
Under New York State law, the governor wields significant executive power and authority over the state’s administrative machinery, encompassing all departments, offices, bureaus, and commissions mandated by the constitution or statute.
The governor of New York also possesses the legal authority to remove the mayor of New York City from his position, an action upheld by both state law and the City Charter. If Hochul were to decide on this drastic course, she would be obligated to present Adams with a “copy of the charges” along with the opportunity to defend himself.
Should such an extraordinary action take place, Adams would find himself suspended from his duties for a period of up to 30 days. During this time, he would need to present a robust defense to validate his position. Following this process, Hochul could choose to either reinstate him or remove him permanently from the mayoral seat.
The procedures and implications of such an unprecedented scenario are largely shrouded in uncertainty, particularly because no mayor in New York City’s history has ever confronted criminal charges while in office. If Hochul were to proceed with an official discharge of Adams’ duties, it would mark a historic and monumental event, as he would become the first sitting mayor to be ousted from office. This contrasts sharply with the resigned fates of two former mayors—Jimmy Walker in 1932 and William O’Dwyer in 1950—both of whom stepped down rather than face similar scrutiny.